Global Vetting Transparency
There is an overarching need for greater clarity when an organization is submitted through any global vetting process supported by the site. Suggest an Org in particular is causing loss of visibility into progress toward vetting.
Transparency into the steps of the process and progress along those steps, visible to both the person who submitted them and any admin who is supporting the process is the desired end state.
-
Guest
- Mar 4 2026
| Employee Name | Holley LeFeber |
Related ideas
1,000% agree with this and will echo the responses from Kaliya and Lyndsey. We are attempting to increase program utilization globally and the different SaO/Vetting processes is difficult to communicate to colleagues AND has a lack of transparency in outreach process when submitted through the site. It has been a very common question for colleagues requesting to add or vet an organization through YCBB's network.
I couldn't agree more!! I end up fielding a lot of questions about this and have to reach out to the charity team to request an update. When I request an update I often either don't hear back or it is some time before I get a response. Our partners both internal and external have provided some lengthy feedback about how frustrating the process is and the lack of visibility in understanding on where the application is in the process.
Our vetting requests are typically for formal partnerships with a ngo. The lack of visibility or understanding of the process leaves things often in a standstill and doesn't allow us to follow up to ensure things are progressing
I wish I could vote on this 1,000 times!! Having access to this relevant information that is only current available through CSM's or special services projects would SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE visibility to our stakeholders, decrease questions/administrative time to field the questions centrally to become more of a self-serve approach, and also decrease the amount of money we spend on special services.